Brandeis University is committed to maintaining a fair and professional academic, work and athletic environment in which members of the faculty and staff carry out their responsibilities in a way that is both respectful to those over whom they have authority and conducive to the development of a just and flourishing academic community. A sexual or romantic relationship between a faculty or a staff member and a person with whom they have professional responsibility i. With professional responsibility comes power. It is incumbent on faculty and staff members not to abuse, or seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted. In order to avoid potential conflicts of interest, favoritism, exploitation, harassment or breaches of professional standards, the university prohibits romantic or sexual relationships, even when consensual, where there is supervision, direction or control between the parties. This policy applies to all faculty and staff employees of Brandeis University. This policy applies to consensual romantic, dating and sexual relationships between employees faculty and staff and students; and employees with other employees. This policy does not replace or limit university policies on prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation or other policies that may be triggered by conduct or relationships covered in this policy. Student-to-student relations are governed by the student handbook, Rights and Responsibilities, which can be found on the website of the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards.
4.1 Inappropriate Conduct by Faculty Members
Browse our list of frequently asked questions, scenarios, and resources for graduate student instructors. Graduate students who are TAing for classes running online should also consult this guidance. If you have difficulties working out accommodations, discuss with the faculty course leader. Often a student will approach you with a proposed accommodation.
With shows like Pretty Little Liars and Friends normalizing professor-student relationships, it isn’t quite clear whether or not these kinds of.
With shows like Pretty Little Liars and Friends normalizing professor-student relationships, it isn’t quite clear whether or not these kinds of connections are actually ethically OK. Wondering if you can you date your RA, TA, or professor? This isn’t a question you should feel ashamed ask, especially if you spend a lot of quality time with them.
Between office hours, dorm meetings, and recitation, it’s perfectly natural to feel somewhat bonded to these authority figures. At the time, Fitz didn’t know Montgomery would become his high school English student, but he continued to pursue a relationship with her after he found out. Throughout both series, the inappropriate nature of these relationships is frowned upon, but not condemned.
McMaster University should ban student-faculty relationships
Policy no. Case Western Reserve University is a community that values an environment of inclusion, trust, and respect as beneficial for the working and learning environment of all its constituents. Romantic or sexual relationships may occur in a University environment given the numbers of people on a University campus. All relationships must be consensual; but, even though the relationship is consensual, it can raise serious concerns about the validity of the consent, conflicts of interest, and preferential treatment.
There are certain circumstances when romantic or sexual relationships are expressly prohibited, unless managed as described below:. Such relationships also may have the potential to result in claims of sexual harassment.
However, when the situation does arise that a TA is dating his or her student while still teaching him or her, the relationship violates the.
This policy highlights the risks in sexual or romantic relationships in the Stanford workplace or academic setting between individuals in inherently unequal positions; prohibits certain relationships between teachers and students; and requires recusal from supervision and evaluation and notification in other relationships. Applies to all students, faculty, staff, and others who participate in Stanford programs and activities.
There are special risks in any sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions, and parties in such a relationship assume those risks. In the university context, such positions include but are not limited to teacher and student, supervisor and employee, senior faculty and junior faculty, mentor and trainee, adviser and advisee, teaching assistant and student, principal investigator and postdoctoral scholar or research assistant, coach and athlete, attending physician and resident or fellow, and individuals who supervise the day-to-day student living environment and their students.
Because of the potential for conflict of interest, exploitation, favoritism, and bias, such relationships may undermine the real or perceived integrity of the supervision and evaluation provided. Further, these relationships are often less consensual than the individual whose position confers power or authority believes. In addition, circumstances may change, and conduct that was previously welcome may become unwelcome.
Even when both parties have consented at the outset to a sexual or romantic involvement, this past consent does not remove grounds for a charge based upon subsequent unwelcome conduct. Such relationships may also have unintended, adverse effects on the climate of an academic program or work unit, thereby impairing the learning or working environment for others — both during such a relationship and after any break-up.
Relationships in which one party is in a position to evaluate the work or influence the career of the other may provide grounds for complaint by third parties when that relationship gives undue access or advantage, restricts opportunities, or simply creates a perception of these problems. Additionally, even when a relationship ends, there may be bias even if unintentional for or against the former partner, or there could be an ongoing impression of such bias; in other words, the effects of a romantic or sexual relationship can extend beyond the relationship itself.
For all of these reasons, sexual or romantic relationships–whether regarded as consensual or otherwise–between individuals in inherently unequal positions should in general be avoided and in many circumstances are strictly prohibited by this policy.
2020-2021 Graduate Bulletin
By Sharon Wu. Coupled with our developing passions for what we study, an encounter with someone with a depth of knowledge in our field can be incredibly alluring. But what about TAs? They walk the fine line between equal and superior. And they too are usually intelligent, accomplished, published, and passionate. We experience our TAs in a much more relaxed, casual setting.
I had a student who always wrote with the largest or most out-of-date words he Teacher’s assistants are still students and the relationship between T.A. and.
Institutions tend to either ban student-faculty dating altogether or where a supervisory relationship exists. The ages of the couple — her, 25; him, 71 — are unusually far apart. Princeton, like a growing number of institutions, has banned all student-faculty relationships, including for graduate students. Platt has said that she waited until two years after her graduation to ask Mitchell out.
Mitchell, who is currently on preplanned leave, is just one of a number of professors to engage in or attempt to initiate a relationship with a former student or students. Still, experts with different positions on student-faculty dating advise against adopting any kind of timeline for dating former students.
It is improper for a faculty member, instructional assistant, or other University employee to participate in the instruction, evaluation, or supervision of a student with whom there is an amorous relationship or familial relationship. Violation of this policy may result in disciplinary procedures. It applies to all full- and part-time faculty tenure and non-tenure track , lecturers, and graduate and undergraduate assistants, and all other employees.
Central to the educational mission of the University is the establishment of close working relationships between those who teach and those who learn.
As students and teaching assistants (TAs) return to classes, some will After matching on the dating app Hinge, Lana* spoke to her TA, but the.
By: Anonymous contributor. I never imagined that I would date my teaching assistant. Dating my TA was probably one of the worst decisions of my undergraduate degree. Dating your TA is much more socially-accepted than dating your professor or course instructor. When I had talked with my TA about our relationship, he told me that the department frowned upon student-TA relationships but there was no strict rule against them.
As long as he gave my assignments to another TA to grade, nobody batted an eye at our relationship. Even when I got out of the relationship, I still felt ashamed and embarrassed every time I had to see him in tutorial or lecture.
Can You Date Your RA, TA, Or Professor? Here’s How To Handle The Situation
Close Search form Search. Consensual Relationships Policy. Interactions between the students of the University and those administrators, faculty and staff who have institutional authority over them are to be guided by mutual trust, confidence, and professional ethics. Any consensual relationship between a student on the one hand and any faculty member, administrator, or staff member on the other has the potential to put these values at risk.
Likewise, familial or collegial relationships such as holding a position of authority over one’s children, one’s colleagues, or family members of colleagues may lead to the reality or the perception of bias. The University calls the attention of all members of the University community to these dangers, and notes the appropriateness of existing grievance procedures for dealing with abuses that may arise in all these situations.
Like so many college students, Cedric and Michelle began their many relationships, however, Cedric was her teaching assistant at the time.
The University has an interest in ensuring that academic, employment, and business matters are decided on objective bases. At an institution such as the University of Arizona, a variety of personal and romantic relationships may exist among employees, University agents, students, and third parties. The University establishes this personnel policy to address conflicts of interest arising from interpersonal relationships not otherwise covered by existing policies or law.
The intent of this policy is to direct employees to disclose relationships that have created or may create conflicts of interest and to give the University an opportunity to manage and reconcile any such conflicts, if possible. Employees who violate this policy may be subject to disciplinary action; however, because this policy is designed to encourage employees to disclose personal relationships that may give rise to or have given rise to conflicts of interest, an alleged violation of this policy may not be a basis upon which employees may file grievances against one another.
Relationships with Students Outside the Instructional, Supervisory, or Evaluative Context: Romantic or sexual relationships between employees and students when the employees do not have a direct instructional, supervisory, or evaluative responsibility with respect to the student are not per se prohibited. They may, however, result in a conflict of interest, particularly when the employee and student are in the same unit or in units that are allied.
Employee-Student Consensual Relationships
Physical contact is not a required element of such relationships. A Covered Relationship may exist on the basis of a single interaction. The University of Michigan strives to create and maintain a community that enables each person to reach their full potential. To do so requires an environment of trust, openness, civility, and respect. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process. As a matter of sound judgment and professional ethics, faculty members have a responsibility to avoid any apparent or actual conflict between their professional responsibilities and personal relationships with students.
It is improper for a faculty member, instructional assistant, or other University of close working relationships between those who teach and those who learn.
To advance its educational mission, Carnegie Mellon University is committed to creating and maintaining a learning and work environment that fosters creativity, growth, emotional and physical wellbeing and the pursuit of scientific, academic and artistic excellence. The willingness and ability of individuals in this community to form close, professional relationships is critical to the success of this commitment. They also encourage the reasonable perception of placing others who do not engage in similar intimate relations at a disadvantage or the reasonable perception that the University condones the unfair and potentially exploitative exercise of professional authority and institutional influence.
The validity of consent depends on, among other things, it being voluntary free from manipulation, coercion, or undue influence. Intimate relationships of unequal power, authority or influence can undermine the validity of consent. Moreover, even when consent is freely given at the outset, consent can be withdrawn at any time. Because ending intimate relations between individuals involved in professional relationships can involve actual or perceived consequences in the workplace, educational environment or the professional realm, the threat of such consequences can lead to the perception that at some point the intimate relationship was no longer consensual.
Such intimate relations pose risks to the parties to the relationship, other members of the community, the educational program, and the University, including but not limited to claims of sexual harassment including hostile environment claims and quid pro quo claims , sexual assault, related civil or criminal claims, and reputational risk to all involved.
The unclear rules of student-TA relationships
Additional safety training may be required by your supervisor, depending on your work location and responsibilities. A TA training session is held each Fall and Winter semester. The details will be posted on the ME Website and in our department email bulletin to current students.
Last Revised Date: Relationships with Students Outside the Instructional, Supervisory, or Evaluative Context: Romantic or sexual other students; graduate students with supervisory or teaching responsibilities, including instructors, whether.
The new site update is up! Is it okay to date a student once the semester is over? I am a grad student in my late 20s. I’m teaching a course and I find one of my students a junior ridiculously attractive. I’ve been careful to maintain a professional relationship and not show any favoritism if anything, I probably grade this student slightly harder than my others. There is no chance that I’ll teach this student in the future. Replies from people in academia would be great, because while I don’t personally have any ethical problem with this I am curious as to what my fellow grad students or professors in my department would think of me if they were to find out–and if that would affect my professional standing in any way.
Do you think you’ll have a better chance of getting her in bed if you give her a good grade? The existence of that question should be enough to answer your question. A friend of mine met his now wife when he was a Grad student teaching a class.
Want to Date Your TA? Start Stalking and Get Sexy, Says College Paper
For a better experience, click the icon above to turn off Compatibility Mode, which is only for viewing older websites. Drexel University is committed to maintaining an environment in which learning and discovery take place in a professional atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. While the University respects the privacy of its members, Drexel recognizes that there exists the opportunity for the inappropriate use of power, trust or authority. Certain relationships in the work and educational setting have the potential to compromise, or appear to compromise, the fairness and objectivity of employment and educational decisions and the discharge of other professional duties.
This policy is intended to promote employment and academic decisions and conduct in the work and educational setting that avoid a conflict of interest, appearance of favoritism, abuse of power, or potential for a hostile work or academic environment.
Effective Date: July over other Students, such as teaching assistants, research assistants, evaluators, graders, advisors, mentors or in similar positions.
This policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on June 21, The University has a duty to provide for the student those privileges, opportunities, and protections which best promote the learning process in all its aspects. The relationship between an instructor  and a student plays an important role in accomplishing this mission. Certain responsibilities bestowed upon instructors have long been codified in the Faculty Rights and Responsibilities policy:. The teacher has the responsibility to encourage the pursuit of learning by students by manifesting the best academic standards of the discipline or profession.
To accord students respect as individuals, the teacher shall seek to establish a relationship of mutual trust and to establish an appropriate role as an intellectual guide, counselor and mentor, both in and out of the classroom. The relationship between instructor and student as individuals should be founded on mutual respect, trust and understanding, together with shared dedication to the educational process.
Instructors carry a responsibility to students, colleagues, the scholarly community, and the public to perform their duties in a professional, respectful, and collegial manner  , and must do so with a commitment to honoring the highest ethical standards. They are regarded as guardians of the University, charged with preserving in it the privilege of teaching students which society has entrusted to their care.
The University is committed to creating a safe learning environment free of conflicts of interest in achieving its educational mission. It is therefore recognized by Michigan State University that consensual amorous and sexual relationships between instructors and students are counterintuitive to these rights and responsibilities, to the environment desired, and in upholding the mission of the University.
Such personal relations undermine the integrity of the instructor and student relationship. There is an inherent power differential between instructors and students making consensual amorous and sexual relationships between instructors and students fundamentally unequal.